Legal Opinion

Brown v. Babcock

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1975PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is an action at lawT for damages allegedly suffered bv plaintiffs as the result of legal malpractice by the defendant attorneys in the defense of a suit against the plaintiffs to foreclose a land sale contract. The case, was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict for defendants.

In appealing from the resulting judgment plaintiffs’ sole assignment of error is that the. trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury, as a matter of law, that plaintiffs’ action had been brought- within the time allowed by the statute, of limitations and that the jury was to therefore disregard…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Berry v. BrannerOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Frohs v. GreeneOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Hotelling v. WaltherOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Hall v. CORNETTOregon Supreme Court · 1952

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. McCoy v. LyonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Wettanen v. CowperAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Reis v. CoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API