Legal Opinion
Inniss v. Tandy Corp.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 31, 2000No. 68225-9PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
— Petitioners Patrick S. Inniss, Sam R. Lopez and Adnan I. Haq seek review of a decision of the Court of Appeals, Division One, which affirmed an order of summary judgment by the King County Superior Court in favor of their employer, Respondent Tandy Corporation, in their action challenging calculation of their overtime compensation. The Court of Appeals concluded in an unpublished opinion the employment practice of a “fluctuating workweek” did not violate the Washington Minimum Wage Act, chapter 49.46 RCW, when calculating overtime compensation at “one and one-half times the regular rate”…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Walling v. A. H. Belo Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Millay v. CamWashington Supreme Court · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Alvarez v. IBP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Bostain v. Food Exp., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Fiore v. PPG Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.