Legal Opinion

Godwin v. City of Bellflower

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 5, 1992No. B055905PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MANELLA, J. *

Issue Presented

Plaintiff, Andrew Godwin, appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendants Virgilio Panganiban, M.D., and Robert Hart, M.D. The superior court found plaintiff’s complaint for medical malpractice was untimely as against Drs. Panganiban and Hart, because it was filed after the applicable one-year statute of limitations. The court was called upon to interpret Code of Civil Procedure section 364, which requires a plaintiff to give 90 days’ notice before bringing a medical malpractice suit against a health care provider, but extends the applicable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Woods v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Anson v. County of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Davis v. LOCAL UNION NO. 11, INTERNAT.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Braham v. SorensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Capron v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hanooka v. PivkoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Jones v. Catholic Healthcare WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Silver v. McNameeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Wurts v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Derderian v. DietrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API