Legal Opinion

Silver v. McNamee

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 14, 1999No. D030531PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*272Opinion

KREMER, P. J.

Plaintiff Wallace Silver appeals a summary judgment favoring defendant Lawrence McNamee on Silver’s complaint for medical malpractice. Silver contends the superior court erred in concluding this lawsuit was time barred as a matter of law. We reverse the judgment.

I

Introduction

The parties dispute whether Silver timely served McNamee with notice of intent to sue (Code Civ. Proc.,1 § 364)2 so as to toll for 90 days the 1-year limitations period of section 340.5. Resolution of this case involves analysis of the interplay among subdivisions (a) and (d) of section 364 and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Woods v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Heinlen v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Poster v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Hanooka v. PivkoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Camper v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jones v. Catholic Healthcare WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. Selvidge v. Tang, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. DeCosta v. GossageMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Marriage of Foscalina CA3California Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Selvidge v. TangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API