Legal Opinion

Wurster v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1999No. 49A02-9802-CR-126PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RILEY, Judge

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Defendants-Appellants Samuel Turpin (“Turpin”), James Wurster (“Wurster”) and Willis Conner (“Conner”) appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motions to dismiss the grand jury indictment charging each of the three defendants with bribery, Wurster and Conner with unlawful lobbying, and Turpin with five counts of filing a fraudulent report and one count of perjury.

We affirm in part and reverse in part.

ISSUES

The following consolidated issues are presented for our review:

1. Whether the trial court erred in denying motions to dismiss the indictment…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. McCormick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. Robert J. L'hoste, R. J. L'Hoste & Company, Inc., Clarence Eugene Rogers and Marvin Cochran, in Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  4. Mitchem v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Averhart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wurster v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Chavez v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Timothy H. Bryant v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. State v. CameronCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2005
  5. Winn v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API