Legal Opinion

State v. Cameron

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided June 3, 2005No. A-8785PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

Alaska Criminal Rule 6(p) states that “the grand jury has no duty to hear evidence on the behalf of the defendant, [but] it may do so.” In this case, the defendant notified the prosecutor’s office that he wished to appear before the grand jury and testify to a particular exculpatory version of the episode under consideration. The prosecutor did not apprise the grand jurors of the defendant’s request, and the grand jury subsequently indicted the defendant without hearing the defendant’s testimony.

We must decide whether, under these circumstances, a prosecuting attorney…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Frink v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Demoski v. NewAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Millman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1992
  5. Preston v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cameron v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Indico (Elinor) v. Dist. Ct. (State)Nevada Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  4. State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API