Legal Opinion
Wurster v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided July 28, 1999No. 49S02-9907-CR-404PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION TO TRANSFER
BOEHM, Justice.
This case raises a number of issues. We summarily affirm the Court of Appeals under Appellate Rule 11(B)(3) as to all except three. The issues summarily affirmed include the Court of Appeals’ dismissal of the indictments of former State Representative Samuel R. Turpin, James A. Wurster, and Willis R. Conner for bribery and of Wurster for unlawful lobbying. We also summarily affirm the Court of Appeals’ ruling that the prosecution of Turpin on five counts of filing a fraudulent report may proceed.
We hold today that (1) a prosecutor may not prevent grand…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rose v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Averhart v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Willey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Spears v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Laughner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Reiswerg v. StatomIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Neff v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Baugh v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.