Legal Opinion

DAP Financial Management Co. v. Mor-Fam Electric, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 25, 2000No. AC 18956PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LANDAU, J.

The issue in this appeal arises from a settlement agreement (settlement) reached by the par*93ties, through counsel, in an action on a note brought by the plaintiff, DAP Financial Management Co., against the defendants, Mor-Fam Electric, Inc., Bruce V. Morris, Bruce L. Morris and Richard W. Robinson.1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly concluded that there was a binding agreement between the parties by finding that (1) counsel had agreed to the settlement and (2) counsel for the plaintiff had authority to settle the case. We affirm the judgment of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Audubon Parking Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Barclay & Stubbs, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. State v. MejiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. Bowman v. 1477 Central Avenue Apartments, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. State v. McClamConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nanni v. Dino Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  2. Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  3. Barber v. Skip Barber Racing School, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  4. REID AND RIEGE, PC v. BulakitesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  5. Brycki v. BryckiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API