Legal Opinion

Floeck v. United Benefit Life Ins. Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1948No. 5067PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SADLER, Justice.

The question for decision is whether the proration clause found in the standard form of accident insurance policy, limiting liability of insurer to a specified part of total amount of like indemnity in all policies covering the same loss, absent written notice to company of the other insurance, is applicable to death benefits.

The plaintiff below, the appellee here, is the widow and sole beneficiary designated in two certain policies of insurance in which her husband, Gerald Edgar Floeck, was named as insured, taken out during his lifetime and in full force and effect at the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Arneberg v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Bowles v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  3. Provident Life & Accident Ins. v. RimmerTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Graham v. Business Men's Assur. Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  5. Continental Ins. Co. v. RiggsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. PachecoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Szantho v. THI of N.M. at Sunset VillaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API