Legal Opinion
Orth v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 24, 1966No. Civ. 704PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.
An application is made herein for a writ of mandate, or other appropriate writ, to require the superior court to entertain an application for the amendment of a probate claim filed by Gladys F. Orth. Mrs. Orth has also filed an action for the recovery of damages from the estate of John D. Ditto, deceased, by reason of an automobile collision, which was the source of injury and damage to Mrs. Orth and which, incidentally, also caused his death. The probate court refused to permit the amendment of a claim which had been filed by Mrs. Orth and denied prior to the institution of the civil suit.
Thi…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Canadian & American Mortgage & Trust Co. v. Clarita Land & Investment Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Radar v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Estate of O'DeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Knight v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Perry v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Billups v. TiernanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Zapata v. MeyersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Estate of McCormackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Estate of MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- McDonald v. STRUCTURED ASSET SALES, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.