Legal Opinion
Billups v. Tiernan
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 21, 1970No. Civ. 26395PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAYLOR, J.
Plaintiff, Bernice Billups (hereafter Bernice), individually and as the guardian ad litem of her minor son Anthony, appeals from a judgment decreeing that her individual cause of action is barred by Code of Civil Procedure section 340, and that the minor’s cause of action is barred by his failure to file a creditor’s claim pursuant to Probate Code sections 700 and 707. The contentions on appeal are that: 1) the dismissal of the minor’s prior action for want of prosecution pursuánt to Code of Civil Procedure section 583 is not a bar to the minor’s present action; 2) the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Williams v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Artukovich v. AstendorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Hurlimann v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Kadota Fig Ass'n of Producers v. Case-Swayne Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
- Satterfield v. GarmireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Nathanson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Tzolov v. International Jet Leasing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Eng v. Brown, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Sacramento E.D.M., Inc. v. Hynes Aviation Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Balloon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.