Posten Taxi Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by,
Reno, J.,
This appeal is from an order of the Public Utility Commission, made upon the complaint of Roy H. Thompson, intervening appellee, commanding Posten Taxi Company, a partnership consisting of Harry and Hermoine Lieberman, appellants, to cease and desist from operating scheduled transportation service between the city of Wilkes-Barre and the Scranton-Wilkes-Barre Airport at Avoca, Pennsylvania. Appellants deny the charge and contend their activities are within the scope of their certificate of public convenience which authorizes transportation of persons “upon call or demand…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hoffman v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Shenandoah Suburban Bus Lines, Inc., CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- John Benkart & Sons Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Sayre v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- York Express Co. v. P. S. C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marmer v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- United States v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- New York Central Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Schuster v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Morrisville Borough v. ScarponeBucks County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.