Legal Opinion

John Benkart & Sons Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 1939No. Appeal, 172PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

George DeBolt, George DeBolt, Jr., and J. P. DeBolt, copartners, trading as DeBolt Transfer, applied to the Public Utility Commission for the extension of the privileges granted by their certificate of public convenience. This certificate authorized them, inter alia, to transport property, as a class C carrier, from points in Homestead and within 5 miles, excluding the city of Pittsburgh, to points within 15 miles, and vice versa.

Protests against the granting of the application were filed by numerous carriers operating within the area covered by the proposed extension of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. John Benkart & Sons Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. Beaver Valley Service Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Steward v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Moderm Trans. Co. v. Pa. Pub. Util. Com.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Modern Transfer Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Kulp v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Yellow Cab Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API