Legal Opinion

Sayre v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1947No. Appeal, 31PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Dithrich, J.,

For years Chester C. Sayre, appellant, has had a virtual monopoly in the highly specialized field of transporting or vanning horses for hire for race, hunt, and show purposes in Allegheny County and most of western Pennsylvania. Contending that “. . . in order to stay in business and maintain [his] equipment [he would] have to do about 90 per cent of the business,” he has appealed an order of the Public Utility Commission granting a limited certificate to Edward W. Seifert “To transport, as a Class D carrier, horses between points in that part of the County of Allegheny…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Kulp v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Alko Express Lines v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. York Express Co. v. P. S. C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Colombo v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. H. J. Gongaware & Sons v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Reeder v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Follmer Trucking Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API