Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 16, 1978No. C-74-2282 WWSPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SCHWARZER, District Judge.

This action was brought by eight women and one black male individually against The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company (“Pacific”). 1 All plaintiffs charge Pacific with violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The female plaintiffs also charge Pacific with violation of the Equal Pay Act of 1963, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d) and the black male plaintiff charges a violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Plaintiffs allege that Pacific discriminated against women and blacks by hiring them into a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Celia SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD BRANDS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vuyanich v. Republic Nat. Bank of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1980
  2. Richardson v. Restaurant Marketing Associates, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1981
  3. Gerlach v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1980
  4. Feher v. Department of Labor & Industrial RelationsDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API