Legal Opinion

Feher v. Department of Labor & Industrial Relations

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided March 17, 1983No. Civ. 78-0437PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR INTERIM ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

FONG, District Judge.

Factual Background

This Memorandum of Opinion and Order is addressed to the question of the appropriate amount of attorneys’ fees and costs to be awarded to the law firm of Paul, Johnson and Alston, the private attorneys representing a Caucasian female in an employment discrimination suit, brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, §§ 701 et seq., Pub.L. No. 88-352, 78 Stat. 255 (1964), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. (1976) (codified at 42 U.S.C.A.…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schefke v. Reliable Collection Agency, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Spell v. McDanielDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1985
  3. Robinson v. AriyoshiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API