Legal Opinion

Matter of Marriage of Ortiz

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1990No. TC 82-2357; CA A60104; SC S37187PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

This is a custody modification proceeding. ORS 107.135(1)(a). The issue is whether a stipulated visitation order is a custody order for the purpose of the change of circumstances rule. Henrickson v. Henrickson, 225 Or 398, 358 P2d 507 (1961). The Court of Appeals held that it is not. Ortiz and Ortiz, 101 Or App 362, 790 P2d 555 (1990). We agree and affirm.

In 1983, a stipulated dissolution judgment was entered, awarding custody of the parties’ children to mother, subject to father’s reasonable visitation. In 1984, the judgment was amended, again by stipulation, changing custody of the children…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GreisamerOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. McFadden v. McFaddenOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Gonyea v. GonyeaOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Henrickson v. HenricksonOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Bogh v. LumbattisOregon Supreme Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel Johnson v. BailOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In re the Marriage of DillardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  3. In re the Marriage of SouthworthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. In re the Marriage of StevensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Patel v. PatelSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API