Lipscomb v. State Bd. of Higher Ed.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLinde, J.
In 1921, the Governor’s veto power under the Oregon Constitution was amended to include, besides single items in appropriation bills, “any provision in new bills declaring an emergency, without thereby affecting any other provision of such bill.” The present dispute concerns whether the quoted words empower the Governor to veto only an emergency clause or any provision of a bill if the bill contains such a clause.
In 1983, the Legislative Assembly passed Senate Bill 137, which made certain changes in the Public Employes’ Retirement System (PERS). One section amended an existing provision (ORS…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. BallinSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human ResourcesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Eckles v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Ecumenical Ministries v. Oregon State Lottery CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Rooney v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Utsey v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.