CITY COUNCIL OF CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU v. Fasi
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
MARUMOTO, J.
In a complaint filed in tlie first circuit court against tlie mayor of the city and county of Honolulu, its managing director, director of finance, and the director of *4parks and recreation, the city council sought a judgment mandating the defendants to comply with Resolution No. 436 (1969), and enjoining them from acting in any manner contrary to the resolution.
Resolution No. 436 requires the director of finance to offer the Queen’s Surf property at public auction as a restaurant and night club concession for ten years from January 1, 1970. The Queen’s Surf…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Koike v. Board of Water SupplyHawaii Supreme Court · 1960
- In re Eklund to Register Title to Real Property Situate at Pahoehoe 3rd & 4thHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
- Application of EklundHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
- In re the Appeal of KokiHawaii Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by9 opinions
- Board of Medical Quality Assurance v. GherardiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- State v. SpeerArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- Harris v. DeSotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- Akahane v. FasiHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
- Maui County Council v. ThompsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.