Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David J. Bartz

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 2015No. 2014AP002918-DPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review a stipulation filed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.12 by the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) and Attorney David J. Bartz. In the stipulation, Attorney Bartz agrees that he committed five counts of professional misconduct. He also agrees that a 60-day suspension of his license to practice law in Wisconsin is an appropriate sanction, and he agrees to pay restitution to one client and to the Wisconsin Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection (Fund). The OLR is not seeking an assessment of costs against Attorney Bartz.

¶ 2. After careful review of the matter, we approve the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against RieglemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against BarrockWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Steven J. SarbackerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Sonja C. Davig HuesmannWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kitto (In Re Kitto)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Sandra J. ZenorWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. LundeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API