In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Riegleman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Per curiam
¶ 1. We review the stipulation filed by Attorney Dan A. Riegleman and the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) pursuant to SCR 22.12 1 setting forth findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding Attorney Riegleman's professional misconduct in connection with his handling of a financial settlement obtained in connection with his representation of a client involved in a motor vehicle accident. The parties stipulated to a 60-day suspension of Attorney Riegleman's license to practice law.
¶ 2. We approve the stipulation and adopt the stipulated facts and conclusions of law. We agree that Attorney…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David J. BartzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. LundeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
- In Re Disc. Proceedings Against ReitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. DeMaioWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Shawn G. RiceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.