Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Riegleman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 2003No. 02-0406-DPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review the stipulation filed by Attorney Dan A. Riegleman and the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) pursuant to SCR 22.12 1 setting forth findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding Attorney Riegleman's professional misconduct in connection with his handling of a financial settlement obtained in connection with his representation of a client involved in a motor vehicle accident. The parties stipulated to a 60-day suspension of Attorney Riegleman's license to practice law.

¶ 2. We approve the stipulation and adopt the stipulated facts and conclusions of law. We agree that Attorney…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David J. BartzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. LundeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  3. In Re Disc. Proceedings Against ReitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. DeMaioWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Shawn G. RiceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API