Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Sonja C. Davig Huesmann

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 2018No. 2016AP001603-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

¶1 The Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) has appealed a report filed by Referee Allan E. Beatty, accepting a stipulation filed by the OLR and Attorney Sonja C. Davig Huesmann 1 in which Attorney Davig Huesmann admitted the eight counts of professional misconduct alleged in the OLR's complaint. Referee Beatty recommended that Attorney Davig Huesmann be publicly reprimanded for her misconduct. The OLR argues that a public reprimand would unduly depreciate the seriousness of Attorney Davig Huesmann's misconduct and that a suspension of her license to practice law in Wisconsin is appropriate.

¶2…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Disciplinary Proceedings Against ScanlanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David J. BartzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael D. MandelmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Alfredson (In Re Alfredson)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Paul A. StrouseWisconsin Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Beth M. BantWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Beth M. BantWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Osman A. MirzaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API