Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Steven J. Sarbacker
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Per curiam
¶ 1 We review the report and recommendation of Referee James C. Boll, approving a partial stipulation filed by the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) and Attorney Steven J. Sarbacker and concluding that Attorney Sarbacker committed the professional misconduct alleged by the OLR, as stipulated by the parties. The referee determined that a 60-day suspension of Attorney Sarbacker's license to practice law is appropriate.
¶ 2. Upon careful review of this matter, we uphold the referee's findings of fact and conclusions of law and agree that a 60-day license suspension is an appropriate sanction for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Disciplinary Proceedings Against ScanlanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. David J. BartzWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against TrowbridgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kitto (In Re Kitto)Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Sandra J. ZenorWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Brian T. StevensWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Brian T. StevensWisconsin Supreme Court · 2023
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Joseph M. CapistrantWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.