Legal Opinion
Lillebo v. Davis
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 20, 1990No. C006009PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPARKS, J.
Introduction
The Ralph C. Dills Act (Dills Act) (Gov. Code, § 3512 et seq.) has as one of its declared purposes the establishment of “a uniform basis for recognizing the right of state employees to join organizations of their own choosing and be represented by those organizations in their employment relations with the state. It is further the purpose of this chapter, in order to foster peaceful [labor] relations, ... to permit the exclusive representative to receive financial support from those employees who receive the benefits of this representation.” (§ 3512.) To this end,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- International Ass'n of MacHinists v. StreetSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Ellis v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station EmployesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chicago Teachers Union, Local No. 1 v. HudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Railway Employes' Department v. HansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- California Prolife Council Political Action Committee v. ScullyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1998
- San Diego Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. Y.M. (In re Maria Q.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Relyea v. Ventura County Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Paulsen v. Local No. 856 of International Brotherhood of TeamstersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Jerabek v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.