Legal Opinion
Paulsen v. Local No. 856 of International Brotherhood of Teamsters
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 18, 2011No. A126633PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RIVERA, J.
Plaintiffs Kathleen Paulsen and others1 appeal a judgment entered after the trial court sustained without leave to amend the demurrer of defendants Local No. 856 of International Brotherhood of Teamsters (Local 856) and Joe Martinelli to plaintiffs’ putative class action complaint. They contend on appeal that their action was not subject to the exclusive initial jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB). We affirm.
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
Our standard of review when considering a challenge to an order granting a demurrer is well settled. “ ‘ “We treat the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Coachella Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District v. California Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- San Mateo City School District v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Citizens for Open Government v. City of LodiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- City of San Jose v. Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3California Supreme Court · 2010
- El Rancho Unified School District v. National Education Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Boling v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- County of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles County Employee Relations CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- AIDS Healthcare etc. v. State Dept. Health Care etc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Stewart v. Ocwen Loan Servicing CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Wilson v. Service Employees Internat. Union, Local 1000 CA3California Court of Appeal · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.