Fuday v. Gill
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Charlevoix; Mayne, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by Bert Fuday against Alex Gill for broker’s commissions. From a judgment for plaintiff for an insufficient amount, plaintiff appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
There is no dispute of material facts in this case. In 1910 defendant had a farm of 160 acres of land located in Charlevoix county which he desired to dispose of. He was then in Missouri, and negotiated with plaintiff to sell the farm for him. His price on the farm was $2,000. The negotiations were conducted by means of correspondence. On July 22, 1910, defendant wrote plaintiff from Forest City, Mo., telling him what personal property would go with the farm, and saying, so far as material here:
“Now about the extra price you say you will add is all right, all I ask is the $2,000; what you put…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Keys v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
- Morgan v. KellerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Whitaker v. EngleMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- McDonald v. OrtmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Hodgkins v. MeadNew York City Court · 1890
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- West v. NewtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Pittelkow v. Jefferson Park Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Rice-Wray v. PalmaMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- D. & W. Rottschafer Real Estate v. MorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Bowman v. MyersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928