Legal Opinion

Pittelkow v. Jefferson Park Land Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1938No. Docket No. 49, Calendar No. 39,773PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Plaintiff sued defendants to recover a commission upon the sale of real estate, had verdict of the jury, and the trial court on motion of defendants rendered judgment for defendants notwithstanding the verdict. Plaintiff appeals, and upon such appeal the testimony must be considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff.

There is no proof plaintiff was a licensed real estate broker, under 2 Comp. Laws 1929, § 9806 et seq., but no question is raised about it.

The Federal housing commission desired to acquire lands in the city of Detroit for a Federal hous ing project. It would not employ and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Axe v. TolbertMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Antisdel v. CanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Heaton v. EdwardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Fraser v. . WyckoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. McGovern v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ladd v. TeichmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Craib v. Committee on National Missions of the Presbytery of Detroit of the United Presbyterian Church, U.S.A.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Edwards v. CraggSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  4. Calka v. DonahoeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Murphy Real Estate Corp. v. BarronMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API