Legal Opinion

D. & W. Rottschafer Real Estate v. Morris

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1928No. Docket No. 79, Calendar No. 33,900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Defendant owned some vacant lots which he desired to exchange for income-producing property. Plaintiff, a real estate broker, had a two-family flat listed with it by one Wilcox. Defendant in writing offered to turn in his lots at $5,000 and assume a mortgage for $6,000 on the flat, taking it at $11,000, possession to be given November 15, 1927. Wilcox and his wife accepted the proposition in a writing which deferred giving possession until December 1st. Plaintiff acted as a middleman, and both parties agreed in the writing to pay it a commission. The testimony of the parties is in direct…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. St. Matthew's Evangelical Lutheran Church v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Greenberg v. SakwinskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Cochran v. StamanMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. West v. NewtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Blakeslee v. PeabodyMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Heider v. Michigan Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Heider v. Michigan Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API