Legal Opinion

California Viking Sprinkler Co. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 1963No. Civ. 26306PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, P. J.

This is an action based on repudiation of an oral agreement alleged to have been made by defendant to pay $7,768.13 to plaintiff in consideration of the latter’s dis missal of an action against a third party pending in a federal district court. The cause was tried and a jury gave its verdict for plaintiff. Thereupon defendant moved the court alternatively for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. Both motions were denied and defendant noticed an appeal from the judgment entered pursuant to the jury’s verdict and from the order denying said motions for judgment notwithstanding…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Phillips v. G. L. Truman Excavation Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Hamilton v. Oakland School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Mayers v. LitowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. K. King and G. Shuler Corp. v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Arnold v. Newhall County Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Inglewood Teachers Ass'n. v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. United States v. GrubbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  5. United States v. GrubbCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API