Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Newhall County Water District

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 3, 1970No. Civ. 35388PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FORD, P. J.

Defendant Newhall County Water District has appealed from a summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action in which he sought a determination and declaration that certain annexation proceedings were invalid and that consequently the territory included in the “Altered Annexation” 1 was not a part of the defendant district. The first question to be determined is whether the plaintiff sufficiently complied with the provisions of the statutory law governing such an action which are requisite to the acquisition of jurisdiction by the superior court.

In the District…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. City of Ontario v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. In Re Estate of SankeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Kings County Water DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Lyman v. MiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Southland Mechanical Constructors Corp. v. NixenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Closed Basin Landowners Ass'n v. Rio Grande Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. Evartt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. People v. SwinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Katz v. Campbell Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API