Legal Opinion

Mayers v. Litow

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 15, 1957No. Civ. 22305PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

This is an action by a husband and wife for damages predicated upon alleged malpractice arising out of a thyroidectomy performed on plaintiff wife by defendant Litow. The trial court granted judgments of nonsuit in favor of both the doctor and the hospital. Plaintiffs have appealed.

Mrs. Mayers first met Dr. Litow in 1951 when he performed a hysterectomy on her. In 1952 he removed her gall bladder; She had had a nodule on her neck for several years; however, she never experienced any trouble with her neck or throat. Upon examining her prior to the gall bladder surgery, Dr. Litow noticed the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Raber v. TuminCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Hinds v. WheadonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Walski v. TiesengaIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Bardessono v. MichelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Elam v. College Park HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Gherna v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Adamski v. Tacoma General HospitalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API