Legal Opinion

State v. Joy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1995No. 1995-0651PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

The issue before this court is whether the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on one of the statutory definitions of “deprive,” an element of aggravated theft by deception. For the following reasons, we find that the trial court did not err in refusing to give this requested instruction. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

The elements of aggravated theft by deception are found in R.C. 2913.02(A)(3), which reads:

“(A) No person, with purpose to deprive the owner of property or services, shall knowingly obtain or exert control…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. ComenOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. City of Cincinnati v. EppersonOhio Supreme Court · 1969

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. CornwellOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. WellmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. JacintoOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State v. Griffin (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. BarkerOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API