Legal Opinion

State v. Cornwell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1999No. 97-1390PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfeifer, J.

Appellant has raised nine propositions of law. We have reviewed each and have determined that none justifies reversal of appellant’s convictions for aggravated murder and the other crimes he committed. Pursuant to R.C. 2929.05(A), we have also independently weighed the aggravating circumstance against the evidence presented in mitigation and reviewed the death penalty for appropriateness and proportionality. For the reasons that follow, we affirm appellant’s convictions and death sentence.

VOIR DIRE/PRETRIAL ISSUES

Failure to Excuse Biased Jurors

In his first proposition of law, Cornwell…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. Adams (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API