Legal Opinion

State v. Pollard

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 3, 1992No. 25084-1-IPublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, C.J.

Frank Pollard appeals from an order of restitution based on the unlawftd issuance of checks. His court appointed attorney filed an Anders 1 motion to withdraw on the ground that he could find no basis for a good faith argument on review.

Pollard was charged with six counts of unlawfully issuing checks or drafts. The information alleged that Pollard, with the intent to defraud, issued checks from several bank accounts that he knew were not covered by sufficient funds. The six counts alleged the amounts of the checks as follows: count 1, $1,200; count 2, $3,000; count 3, $1,500; count 4, $375;…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. KinnemanWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API