Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Griffith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 2008No. 79883-4PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

195 P.3d 506 (2008)

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Joan Marie GRIFFITH, Petitioner.

No. 79883-4.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued May 29, 2008.

Decided November 6, 2008.

William D. Edelblute, Attorney at Law, Spokane Valley, WA, for Petitioner.

George William Gagnon III, Mark Erik Lindsey, Spokane County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.

J.M. JOHNSON, J.

¶ 1 Joan Marie Griffith appeals the amount of restitution she was ordered to pay after pleading guilty to possessing stolen property in the second degree. She claims substantial evidence does not support the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Washington v. RecuencoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. DavisonWashington Supreme Court · 1991

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Burt, Lemuel CarlCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  2. State v. GrayWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. DeskinsWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. MorsemanKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API