Legal Opinion
Schmidinger v. Welsh
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 26, 1965No. Civ. 97-60PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AUGELLI, District Judge.
This patent infringement suit involves the familiar automobile directional signal flasher.
Plaintiffs charge that the device manufactured and sold by defendants, which operates as a directional signal flasher for automobiles, is an infringement of claims 12, 17, 18, 23 and 26, of plaintiffs’ United States Letters Patent No. Re. 24,-023, hereinafter referred to as the 023 patent.
The action arises under the patent laws of the United States, and more particularly under 35 U.S.C.A. § 271 and §§ 281 to 285 of the same title. Jurisdiction is conferred on the Court by 28…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schmidinger v. WelshCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Merckle GmbH v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
- Ahlert v. Hasbro, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- Schmidinger v. WelshCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Blaw-Knox Co. v. Hartsville Oil MillDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1967