Ahlert v. Hasbro, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
IRENAS, Senior District Judge.
This- matter having appeared before the Court upon Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, the Court having reviewed the submissions of the parties, and it appearing that:
1. Plaintiff Gary Ahlert (“Plaintiff’), d/b/a Creative Group Marketing, filed a complaint with this Court alleging that Defendants Hasbro, Inc. (“Hasbro”) and Larami Ltd. (“Larami”) 1 (collectively, the “Defendants”), improperly appropriated his trade secret, a design concept for a water gun, called the “Water Rat,” which Plaintiff was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Vera L. POLLOCK, Appellant, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH LONG LINESCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Robert v. Baer v. David Chase Chase Films Inc., a Delaware Corporation John Does A-ZCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Baer v. ChaseCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- NITE GLOW INDUSTRIES INC. v. CENTRAL GARDEN & PET COMPANYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020