Legal Opinion
Bumiller v. Bumiller
California Supreme Court
Decided October 4, 1918No. L. A. No. 4566PublishedCited by 8 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, J., pro tem.
This is an action in which the plaintiff seeks to recover from the defendant the possession of 25 shares of stock of the Western Union Oil Company or its value, with damages for its detention. The plaintiff alleges in her amended complaint that being the wife of one Joseph F. Bumiller she commenced on March 14, 1914, an action against him in the county of Los Angeles for divorce and for a division of certain community property, of which the stock in question was alleged to be a portion; that in said action an interlocutory, decree was duly entered on June 18, 1914,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Loughborough v. McNevinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Wetherly v. StrausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- In re the Estate of RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Palmtag v. DoutrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by8 opinions
- Plut v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Messerall v. FulwiderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Simon Newman Co. v. FinkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Covington v. GrantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Ligon v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.