Legal Opinion

Messerall v. Fulwider

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1988No. C000318PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J.

In this case, we discuss what a professional bailee should do when someone other than the bailor demands possession of the bailed property. We conclude that when the bailee is presented with reasonably compelling evidence demonstrating a third party is entitled to possession, the bailee must investigate the third party claim. At a minimum, the bailee should try to ask the bailor whether the property may be released to the third party. If the bailor consents, the bailee should release the property to the third party. If the bailee is unable to obtain the bailor’s consent, the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. The "Idaho."Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Gray v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. County of Imperial v. McDougalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Baldwin v. Marina City Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Farmers Ins. Exchange v. ZerinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. Oakdale Village Group v. FongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Thiara v. Spycher Bros. (In Re Thiara)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Bank of New York v. Fremont General Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. In Re: Bailey, Bruce Albion, Debtor. Jon J. Del Bino v. Bruce Albion BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API