Legal Opinion
Gundersen v. Village of Bingham Farms
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 5, 1964No. Calendar 107, Docket 50,173PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
Tested for validity — in the application thereof to the properties of plaintiffs — is a village zoning ordinance which attempts to restrict use of all property in the village, nonconforming uses only excepted, to single-residence life. The properties of plaintiffs front upon Telegraph road in Oakland county, and are affected adversely by traffic conditions much akin to such as were considered in White v. Township of Southfield, 347 Mich 548.
The principal authority cited by counsel for the defendant village portrays the reason' why an ordinance of such character teeters at the brink of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Village of Orchard LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Hammond v. Bloomfield Hills Building InspectorMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
- City of Moline Acres v. HeidbrederSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Double I Development Co. v. Township of TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Triple G Landfills, Inc. v. Board Of Commissioners Of Fountain CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Nickola v. Grand Blanc TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Gundersen v. Village of Bingham FarmsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
- Sisters of Bon Secours Hospital v. City of Grosse PointeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
- Town of Los Altos Hills v. Adobe Creek Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.