Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Village of Orchard Lake
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.
Defendants appeal from a decree enjoining them from enforcing a zoning ordinance so as to prevent plaintiffs’ erection and maintenance-of a clrurcli and school on premises owned by them before adoption-of the ordinance' and situated in a zone thereunder restricted to use for private dwellings only.
The trial court found as a fact, from the evidence in the case, which need not be recounted here, that although the ordinance appeared on its face to allow churches and schools, under special permit only, in 3 zones comprising about 10% of the village’s area while prohibiting them in the fourth zone…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Austin v. OlderMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Western Theological Seminary v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
- State Ex Rel. Synod of Ohio of United Lutheran Church in America v. JosephOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Northwood Properties Co. v. Royal Oak City InspectorMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Archbishop O'Hara's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Kirk v. Tyrone TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. MullenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Gust v. Township of CantonMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.