Legal Opinion

Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Village of Orchard Lake

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1952No. Docket 51, Calendar 45,238PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, J.

Defendants appeal from a decree enjoining them from enforcing a zoning ordinance so as to prevent plaintiffs’ erection and maintenance-of a clrurcli and school on premises owned by them before adoption-of the ordinance' and situated in a zone thereunder restricted to use for private dwellings only.

The trial court found as a fact, from the evidence in the case, which need not be recounted here, that although the ordinance appeared on its face to allow churches and schools, under special permit only, in 3 zones comprising about 10% of the village’s area while prohibiting them in the fourth zone…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Austin v. OlderMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Western Theological Seminary v. City of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State Ex Rel. Synod of Ohio of United Lutheran Church in America v. JosephOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Northwood Properties Co. v. Royal Oak City InspectorMichigan Supreme Court · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Archbishop O'Hara's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Kirk v. Tyrone TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. MullenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Gust v. Township of CantonMichigan Supreme Court · 1955

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API