State v. Andrews
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON, Judge.
Defendant contends the trial court erred in: (I) finding Kori competent to testify; (II) admitting the testimony of Reverend Knight; and (III) failing to properly instruct the jury.
I
Kori was born on 4 September 1-992. She was four years old at the time of the incident and almost five years old at the time of trial. After a voir dire hearing, Kori was allowed to testify concerning her recollection of the incidents on 12 October 1996. Defendant did not object to her competency as a witness at trial.
Determining whether a child is competent to testify is a matter within the sound…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. BoykinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. FearingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. FordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. MeadowsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Corey Lewis Campbell v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2025
- State v. TerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005