Legal Opinion

State v. Andrews

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 17, 1998No. COA98-107PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Judge.

Defendant contends the trial court erred in: (I) finding Kori competent to testify; (II) admitting the testimony of Reverend Knight; and (III) failing to properly instruct the jury.

I

Kori was born on 4 September 1-992. She was four years old at the time of the incident and almost five years old at the time of trial. After a voir dire hearing, Kori was allowed to testify concerning her recollection of the incidents on 12 October 1996. Defendant did not object to her competency as a witness at trial.

Determining whether a child is competent to testify is a matter within the sound…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. BoykinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. FearingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. FordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. MeadowsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Corey Lewis Campbell v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2025
  4. State v. TerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API