Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 30, 1984No. 425A83PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

In the defendant’s first assignment of error he contends that his statutory right to a speedy trial, under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-701, has been violated. Specifically defendant argues that Superior Court judges holding court in Rowan County committed reversible error in granting five successive motions by the State for continuance, pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-701(b)(7), and in excluding the time covered by the continuances from the Speedy Trial Act’s mandatory 120 day period. Defendant contends the judges who granted the continuances erroneously failed to make findings…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. WitherspoonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. GroomsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. DeLeonardoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. FlowersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. WhitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API