State v. Boykin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
FRYE, Justice.
Defendant seeks a new trial because of three alleged errors committed by the trial court. The defendant contends that the trial court erred in refusing to submit and instruct the jury on simple assault in the felonious assault case; that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the defenses of perfect and imperfect self-defense; and, that the trial court erred in its instruction to the jury concerning voluntary manslaughter. For the reasons stated in this opinion, we find no error in the trial proceedings leading to defendant’s convictions of the crimes charged.
I
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. BushSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. WorsleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. KyleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. HartmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- State v. LoveCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.