Anderson v. War Eagle Consolidated Mining Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
APPEAL from District Court, Ada County. The pleadings admit, and the testimony shows, that the defendant company acquired all the property, stock and business ■of the Twin Springs Placer Company, and hence, under the decisions, the defendant cannot escape from its liability to the plaintiff in this action. (Blair v. St. Louis etc. B. Go., 22 Fed. 36; Chicago B. B. Co. v. Howard, 7 Wall, 329.) From the evidence in this case the defendant is not a, Iona fide purchaser.
Read the full summary
APPEAL from District Court, Ada County. The pleadings admit, and the testimony shows, that the defendant company acquired all the property, stock and business ■of the Twin Springs Placer Company, and hence, under the decisions, the defendant cannot escape from its liability to the plaintiff in this action. (Blair v. St. Louis etc. B. Go., 22 Fed. 36; Chicago B. B. Co. v. Howard, 7 Wall, 329.) From the evidence in this case the defendant is not a, Iona fide purchaser. The defendant had knowledge of the debt sued upon through.the general manager of both companies, and the president and…
1Opinion of the CourtStockslag-Er, J.
— Appellant commenced his action in the trial court to recover on a certain hank cheek purporting to be the check of the Twin Springs Placer Company, alleging: That defendant is a Connecticut corporation, and that the Twin Springs Placer Company is a West Virginia corporation. That the defendant company was authorized by the laws of Connecticut to consolidate with other companies engaged in like business as said defendant, and that by virtue of and under the authority of the laws of Connecticut defendant company did consolidate with the Twin Springs Company, and absorbed *795tbe same. That…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Shields v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Pearce v. Madison & Indianapolis RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Hibernia Ins. v. St. Louis & New Orleans Transp. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1882
- Blair v. St. Louis, H. & K. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1884
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bethlahmy v. BechtelIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- Young v. VailNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Addy v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
- City of Altoona v. Richardson Gas & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
- Ezzard v. State Nat. BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.