Legal Opinion

Hastings Mutual Insurance v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 1984No. Docket 69106PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company brings this appeal as of right from an order entered in the Cass County Circuit Court requiring contribution of 50% of a claim paid by plaintiff Hastings Mutual Insurance Ccimpany to James and Susan Reed.

The litigation below concerned a claim resulting from a fire which destroyed a house, an outbuilding, and personal property belonging to the Reeds. It is undisputed that the property was insured at the time of the fire by Hastings. The issue is whether Hartford was also on risk.

The Reeds dealt with Oliver Scott, an indepen dent insurance agent.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Melia v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Industro Motive Corp. v. Morris Agency, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Holt v. StoffletMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Avon Township v. State Boundary CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Deshler v. GriggMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mary C. Todd v. Dow Chemical Company and Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  2. Rosenbaum v. Davis Iron Works, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987
  3. Tomlin v. Department of Social ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API