Legal Opinion
St. Clair v. Hatch
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 17, 2002No. 97,899Published
1Opinion of the Court
62 P.3d 382 (2002)
2002 OK 101
David Ray ST. CLAIR, Sr., and Paula St. Clair, husband and wife; et al., Plaintiffs/Petitioners,
v.
The Honorable Farrell M. HATCH, Respondent.
No. 97,899.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
December 17, 2002.
Robert A. Nance, Tulsa, OK, for Plaintiffs/Petitioners.
Malinda S. Matlock, Haven Tobias, Oklahoma City, OK, for Real Party in Interest Defendant Jorge A. Saborio, M.D.
John R. Paul, Leah McCaslin Kinsey, Tulsa, OK, for Real Party in Interest Defendant Durant H.M.A., Inc. d/b/a Medical Center of Southeastern Oklahoma.
BOUDREAU, Justice.
¶ 1 We assume original jurisdiction…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Lefkowitz v. Nassau County Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- State ex rel. Letts v. ZakaibWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
- Ex Parte Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- St. Clair v. HatchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.