Legal Opinion

Mordja v. Montana Eleventh Judicial District Court

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 2008No. OP 07-0679PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

¶1 Keith Mordja petitions for a writ of supervisory control to direct Judge Lympus and the Eleventh Judicial District Court to grant his motion to dismiss on the grounds that the statute of limitations has expired. The petition is denied.

¶2 We restate the issue as follows:

¶3 Where a statute is amended to extend the limitations period for a criminal offense, does the extended limitations period apply to offenses not barred at the time of amendment?

BACKGROUND

¶4 On January 29, 2007, Mordja was charged with one count of sexual intercourse without consent in violation of §…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Stogner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Falter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  4. State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. State v. ColemanMontana Supreme Court · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Helena v. Community of RiminiMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  2. United States v. SealeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  3. Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Tipton v. Mont. Thirteenth Judicial Dist. CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Bilbruck v. Valley CountyDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API