Bilbruck v. Valley County
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA GREAT FALLS DIVISION SADY BILBRUCK, Plaintiff, CV-21-40-GF-BMM vs. ORDER VALLEY COUNTY, LUKE STROMMEN, & JOHN DOES 1-3, Defendants. INTRODUCTION Defendant Luke Strommen (“Strommen”) has filed a motion to stay these proceedings. (Doc. 23.) Strommen also has filed a motion in limine to exclude certain evidence, testimony, and argument. (Doc. 61.) Plaintiff Sady Bilbruck (“Bilbruck”) opposes these motions. (Doc. 95 at 1; Doc. 58 at 1.) Bilbruck filed a motion for sanctions that Defendant Valley County (“Valley County”) opposes.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Alphonso Thompson v. The Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, a Public CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Mauricio A. Leon, M.D. v. Idx Systems Corporation, a Vermont Corporation, Mauricio A. Leon, M.D. v. Idx Systems Corporation, a Vermont CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Dependable Highway Express, Inc. v. Navigators Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. HellerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.