Legal Opinion

United States v. Grajeda

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 21, 2009No. 07-50387PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAEZ, Circuit Judge:

Gerardo Grajeda appeals from the 78-month sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. In arriving at this sentence, the district court applied a sixteen-level enhancement to Grajeda’s offense level based on a determination that Grajeda had been previously convicted of assault with a deadly weapon or by means likely to produce great bodily injury under California Penal Code section 245(a)(1), and that such conviction was a “crime of violence” under United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”) § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii).

In…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. United States v. Francisco Gasca-RuizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. Rede-MendezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  4. Garlick v. County of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016
  5. United States v. Gonzalo Vasquez-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API